Accessibility · last updated 31 August 2026
Accessibility statement
This site was built so that anyone can use it, including with a screen reader, with the keyboard alone, or with animations switched off. This page says what has been done, what still falls short, and how to tell us.
Status: partially conformant with WCAG 2.2 level AA. Self-assessment, not an external audit. The points not met are listed below without dressing them up.
1. What already works
- Reduced motion. If your system has "reduce motion" enabled, animations are switched off, the video holds a still frame and the backgrounds stop moving. The design is kept: motion is removed, not content.
- Keyboard navigation. Every link, button and disclosure is reachable with Tab and shows a visible focus outline.
- Alternative text. Every content image has a description. Decorative backgrounds are marked as such so screen readers skip them.
- Skip link (criterion 2.4.1). On all 29 pages the first item the Tab key reaches is a “Skip to content” link that jumps straight to the main content, past the bar and the drawer. It becomes visible as soon as it is focused.
- Contrast measured, not guessed (criterion 1.4.3). On 3 September 2026 every text node was walked with a tool that composes the real background and computes the contrast ratio. It found 47 combinations below the minimum and all were fixed: secondary text went from 3.57:1 to 4.80:1, and the section accent colour now lightens itself automatically until it reaches 4.5:1 on the lightest panel. Poster type sits on a photograph, so it was measured by sampling screen pixels: between 7.95:1 and 11.45:1. Result: 0 failures across 32 page loads.
- Semantic structure. Ordered headings, real lists, sections and a single
<h1>per page. - Three languages. Spanish, English and Dutch, each on its own URL with the language attribute set so screen readers pronounce it correctly.
- No traps. No pop-ups, no countdowns, no unavoidable moving content and no audio that starts on its own.
- Zoom. Content reflows up to 200 % without overflowing or forcing horizontal scrolling.
- Touch targets. Buttons and links with enough surface for a thumb on mobile.
2. What is not met yet
Stated openly, and with the intention of fixing it:
- Cover video. It is decorative, has no dialogue or spoken information and always plays muted. It still lacks an alternative text description.
- Animated backgrounds. Although subtle and disabled by "reduce motion", there is no in-page switch to turn them off.
- No testing with real users. The review is technical. It has not been tested with people who use a screen reader daily, which is the test that actually counts.
3. How this was checked
Self-assessment during development: markup review, alternative text checks, keyboard navigation and testing with the reduced-motion setting enabled. No external audit firm was involved.
4. If something does not work for you
If you hit a barrier — you cannot read something, cannot reach a button, the screen reader gets lost — write to us and we will fix it:
Tell us which page it was, what you were trying to do, and with what device or software. That makes the fault far quicker to find. You will get a reply within fifteen days at most.
5. An alternative that is always available
Everything on this site can be asked about and settled over WhatsApp or by phone. If you find the page hard to use, writing directly is a perfectly valid route and gets the same attention.